
colored pencil done last week during visit down the mountain.
today i want to clarify more of the memes floating around concerning the war, the discontent, the frustration, and mostly the trance the usa collective mind set has demonstrated for awhile.
coup d'etat: looking backwards, the phrase brings up images of small groups of - usually - military seizing the govt. you know this image: they roll tanks in, capture the radio station, institute martial law, and wear ornate banana republic uniforms. soon people begin to disappear.
but what about a contemporary event in a first world country? in the miasma of branded culture, such a thing would be laughed out of existence. the thing to do would be to take over, say, the republican party. and by hook or crook or both get elected. present a harmless, inept doofus as el presidente. note that no military force is involved, and the change is "procedurally correct".
note also that one of the most advanced europeon countries in the 20th c. experieced such a deal. hitler did not steal the power to control germany. it was all - barely - legal. and then the first thing he did was to go after the judiciary.
i would hazard a guess that the german citizens then muttered about it, withdrew from any idea that something wasn't quite right, and did their best to keep living as they had before, waiting for it to go away.
maybe i live in a small world, but literally everyone i personally know seems to be in a similar state today. in my lifetime the electorate has gone from being "john q. public" - a little cartoon man with a globe for a head and a mustache - to a "consumer" to "the audience" or viewer.
we're uncomfortable with the situation, but comfortable with being uncomfortable. we're waiting for the national soap opera to surprise us. the next shoe to drop in the drama we are viewing from the living room.


















































